As part of my recent reading binge, I’ve taken a liking to hard science fiction books and tech thrillers. The description for Cyberstorm by Matthew Mather fit both of those areas, so I decided to pick it up (it didn’t hurt that it was also available at a special promotional price of $0.99).

The brief plot description, without giving too much away, is that an electronic attack on the country’s infrastructure grinds New York City to a halt just as a series of major snowstorms is about  to hit. From there, the story’s chief protagonist, Mike Mitchell, has to team up with other members of his apartment to fight for his, his family’s and his friends’ survival.

While the overall premise of the story is plausible, there were a number of elements of the book that bothered me to the point of making the story unbelievable:

• The description of the series of storms that hit the city are described as though they come out of the movie “The Day After Tomorrow”. I could understand one big storm of that nature, but I can’t recall a series of storms of such devastation hitting the east coast in a long, long time, if ever. Piling additional storms on top of one another wasn’t necessary for Mather to get his point across.
• The string of bad luck that Mike Mitchell runs across gets tiring. Every time he runs into a situation that you think can’t get worse, it does. It feels like you are reading the story line for a B-rate horror movie. On the other hand, it does keep you reading just to see if the guy can ever catch a break.
• I also found the level of paranoia exhibited by Mitchell and the other main characters to be exaggerated. Again, it takes a good story to the point of becoming unbelievable. Primarily, people who exhibit that much paranoia generally don’t survive catastrophic situations very well, particularly when they begin to distrust all those around them and begin looking out only for themselves.

Overall, I wouldn’t recommend the book. It turned out there wasn’t enough in the way of hard science fiction to satisfy my taste, and the tech thriller side of things felt more like a low budget horror movie. There’s much better apocalyptic cyber thrillers out there that contain a better description of the technology behind cyberattacks as well as a more engaging plot. For example, I’d recommend Daemon by Daniel Suarez or Zero Day by Mark Russinovich before Cyberstorm.

For my next dive into science fiction, I chose to read Spin by Robert Charles Wilson. Spin was published in 2005 and is the opening of a three part  book series that includes Axis and Vortex.

The premise behind Spin is very intriguing. The earth has been placed in a “spin membrane” which slows time down for the inhabitants of earth while the universe continues to age naturally. On the surface, this seems like a story line that would be hard to develop, but Wilson does a great job of stretching your imagination to grasp the ramifications of a universe that ages faster than earth as well the possibilities it presents.

The primary character in the book is Tyler Dupree, who, when the book opens, is struggling through some sort of illness which Wilson chooses not to explain. Through the liberal use of flashbacks, it becomes apparent why Tyler is sick and how he fell ill. Wilson also uses the flashbacks to explain how and why the “spin membrane” was put around the earth.  To divulge any more would spoil the book as it is full of plot twists that keep you guessing as to how the present relates to the past.

I wouldn’t put the book into my must read category, but I found it very entertaining. It’s a fun recreational read that will keep your imagination engaged while Wilson explores deeper issues around human nature, particularly around issues such as greed, power and religion. As mentioned at the top, there are two follow on books, Axis and Vortex, that expand upon the original story, but I got my fill with Spin and intend to pass on the sequels for the time being.

Since I was so blown away after reading Brave New World, I was inspired to read the Ray Bradbury classic, Fahrenheit 451. Much like Brave New World and 1984, Fahrenheit 451 is about the effects of government control and censorship on society.

The story focuses on Montag – a fireman whose main focus isn’t to fight fires, but to start them. In order to control information and its dissemination, the government has banned books. Anyone found in possession of them is subject to having their house burned to the ground by the fire department.

Montag has become disillusioned with the societal distractions his wife engages in, which involves heavy doses of television and drugs. He becomes fascinated with the people who hide and defend the books he is ordered to destroy. As such, he begins secretly hoarding books from the houses he is sent to destroy, and therein lies the main plot line of the story.

I’ll admit the story is a classic, but I found it a tough read. Unlike Brave New World, which I found captivating and intense, Fahrenheit 451 felt like it went on forever before getting to the point. In other words, it felt like some of the assigned reading from my high school English classes.

While I can’t recommend reading this book, there was a valuable takeaway for me. Towards the end, Montag is befriended by individuals who have been labeled outcasts for their love of books and knowledge. Montag is speaking with one of them, named Granger, who says:

“Everyone must leave something behind when he dies, my grandfather said. A child or a book or a painting or a house or a wall built or a pair of shoes made. Or a garden planted. Something your hand touched some way so your soul has somewhere to go when you die, and when people look at that tree or that flower you planted, you’re there. It doesn’t matter what you do, he said, so long as you change something from the way it was before you touched it into something that’s like you after you take your hands away. The difference between the man who just cuts lawns and a real gardener is in the touching, he said. The lawn-cutter might just as well not have been there at all; the gardener will be there a lifetime.”

So while I found Bradbury’s work disappointing on the whole, the message in it is profound. That message is not to accept what we are told is right or wrong, or what we should do, but to have the courage to create our own way. Or, in the words of Granger, one should be a gardener rather than a lawn-cutter. The gardener will be remembered, the lawn-cutter won’t.